1,607 Respondents who used emergency contraception at any point (EA-11).
EC has no METHSTOP code — it is episodic and not a continuous method. The 0 dissatisfied-stopper count reflects the survey design, not satisfaction levels.
EC is not listed in EA-17 because it is episodic, not a continuous method. The analysis below shows which regular methods these EC users stopped.
The takeaway
n/a
EC does not appear in the EA-17 dissatisfaction question — it is a one-time backup, not a regular method.
No METHSTOP code for emergency contraception
44.1%
Of EC users stopped at least one regular contraceptive method due to dissatisfaction.
708 out of 1607 EC users
899
EC users who were never dissatisfied with any regular method.
55.9% of all EC users
44.1% = n_had_ea17 708 ÷ n_users 1,607 × 100 — EC users who stopped at least one regular method due to dissatisfaction (EA-17 present).
899 = n_no_ea17 899 — EC users with no EA-17 record (never dissatisfied with any regular method).
Who are these women?
Variable map — demographic profiles
Methods stopped: regular contraceptive methods that EC users stopped due to dissatisfaction (EA-17). EC itself has no METHSTOP entry.
Dissatisfied rate by race: n_had_ea17 ÷ n_users within each racial/ethnic group. Denominators differ by group.